All Questions

Community

D
Lemmily

bypassing setter function?

in Battler.gd in the act() function

you have 

if is_active:

    set_process(true)


But isn't this already being handled in the set_is_active() function? Just curious if this is on purpose or not! (and why if so!)

  • Nathan Lovato replied

    Looking back at the code this condition seems unnecessary indeed. I'll log it to check the final source code and remove it if there's no edge case related to it. Thanks